Thankfully, it seems it has not been affected by the 8 installation as other users have reported.Using C8 64bit and rewire Ableton and FLStudio all in 64bit. C8 looks indeed fantastic, and some of the handling is indeed more to my liking - but the performance issue is a deal breaker. Overall, I have stuck with Cubase forever and Cubase has always made sense to me. I am not sure this is the way I wish to go. I tried to contact Steinberg support, but the report will have to go through some local vendor or something. It remains stabler, and much less ‘glitchy’ and ‘stuttery’ than 8. I just finished a comparison of 8 VS 7.5 on the same project, and 7.5 wins hands down. I work exclusively with vsti’s, and no matter what I did, the problem would persist: Cubase Artist 8 is ‘heavier’ and ‘slower’ on my system. Instead, I found myself looking at a slower and glitchier system when running demanding projects. My main motivation was the “massive engine rebuild” which, I had thought, would lead to a marked increase in performance. I had waited for a while to upgrade from Cubase Artist 7.5 to Cubase Artist 8 due to financial circumstances. I am afraid I will have to confirm the problem. I agree, I have noticed some graphics issues when automating panners and levels. My idea is that there are some serious GUI/Graphic issues with C8… Was almost going to buy a brand new graphic card just to increase graphic performances… but since it works like a charm in 7.0, why would I ?Īs other people said, please release an upgrade version when users can just go for it and be sure that all will work better… Every Cubase upgrade for so many years seems like an unsafe thing to do. In my 7.0.6 version, everything opened in 64bit… all works very well. Many drop outs, glitches, VST performances issues… tried so many tweaks, nothing would fix it.ĭidn’t try the BIOS thing someone posted before about turning off hyperthreading …etc.īut, amazing thing that you can open a C8 project in 7.0.6 (didn’t buy 7.5, tired of all these new paying upgrades) Using C8 64bit and rewire Ableton and FLStudio all in 64bit. How is that possible that i see that big difference in performance boost and others have performance lost? Weird… Of course i’m talking about averange meter not the real time. At all this Asio Guard was enabled.Ĭubase 8 at 64 buffer size (3.xxx ms latency ) and with Asio Guard at high ,project runs smooth between 50% and 80% and all this at that small buffer size.If i raise the buffers the performance meter goes down to 30% has max point at 60%. So Cubase 7.5 at 2048 buffer size (48.xxx ms latency) in my asio driver and i had peaks and i had to go 4096 buffers to can hear it with SOME performance peaks. I have a project with only Vsti’s : 23 kontakt instances with orchestral libraries from strings to percusssion and brass (dont want to name the libraries because off topic).Big and memory hungry libraries.Add to many channels FX like compressors and EQ and 3 Fx channels with reverbs and delays. Today saw this threat and i was wondering how it is possible that i have a performance boost of something like 40% if not more… I upgraded to Cubase Pro 8 from 7.5 yesterday and i did some test’s. I did post in this topic Cubase 8 Pro Performance - Cubase - Steinberg Forums and i will copy/paste
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |